I find it fascinating when I hear people use very binary language; statements which are absolute in nature.
Using words like always and never in our statements create an expectation of certainty.
"We always do things a certain way"
"We never speak to each other like that"
These statements are fine in isolation but unfortunately they rely on our behaviour to carry them through. Human behaviour is dynamic and fluid and; therefore, subject to change based on how we are feeling ourselves; how we are feeling in given setting or subject to change based on circumstances which may influence our actions and reactions.
In an organisational context we might think that we always do things in a certain way; but realistically matters outside of our control such as changes in finances or technology can change our approach, and equally so too might the fluctuations of our own internal emotional and psychological mindset.
Some of the absolute statements I have heard over the years include things like:
- We don't do ego here;
- I've never read a book,
and perhaps the most outlandish:
When I've heard these types of statements, the inquiring part of my thinking kicks into gear and I often ask myself why would someone make such a black and white statement; what meaning sits behind being so completely 100% about something.
When I hear we don't do ego here, I wonder; has that person somehow managed to remove parts of their physical brain and psychological mind that relate to internal presentations of how we view the self and how we would outwardly wish to appear to others.
Or is there perhaps another reason crystalised by Shakespeare's Hamlet; that this person "doth protest too much, methinks"
When I hear "I've never read a book", my immediate thought is:
Never? Really? Are you sure? Not even in school?
And when I hear as I have done in more than one setting, that "I don't make mistakes", my mind similarly questions why such a statement would be made.
Each one of us makes mistakes; whether those mistakes may be in our personal relationships, financial transactions, technically or professionally or even making predcitions about what we think will happen.
Making mistakes is absolutely normal and a key part of our learning allows us to review what happened previously and to adapt our behaviour according to what didn't work out for us.
I don't think I'm alone is my ears pricking up whenever I hear such absolute statements; am I?
In fact our brain's in built threat detection system, with it's watchfulness, can allow us to pick up on the context of language and statements and raise our level of alertness when such absolute statements are made.
We don't do ego here - Well let's wait and see about that.
Indeed all of the above statements set immediate alarm bells ringing in the limbic regions of my brain as my experience and learning connect all of these statements with the subject of the first statement - Ego.
As I work with client organisations, I often find that using language and examples they might be familiar with can help to illustrate points. So let's try this with the utterance of absolute statements.
We all know the story of the little wooden doll who becomes a real life boy and who's nose grows every time he tells a fib.
Think about it like this. Using this analogy the little wooden doll boy is the absolute statement. The behaviour which runs contrary to the absolute statement is the magic which makes the nose grow and our own understanding of language in context and what absolute statements mean, is our ability to see and understand what the nose growing actually means.
So absolute statements like the ones above can awaken our inbuilt threat detection system (our limbic lobe; our amygdala) and prime our system to be on guard. We can perceive the binary nature of the statement and can be primed by experience and learning to question why the statement was made and what lies behind it.
How productive might all of this be when we want to build trust and collaboration with others?
My suggestion is that having created an expectation of absolute outcomes, particularly if those outcomes are as preposterous and contrary to the norms of human behaviour as the ones I've outlined above, this can be enormously counter-productive.
What we're really taking about here is trust. Trust is after all the thing that helps to reduce barriers, create connections and defuse any potential psychological defensiveness. But trust is a fragile commodity and has a definite neuro-chemical and psychological aspect.
If we don't recognise and manage this effectively, the result can be increased psychological defensiveness; diminished trust, silo functioning and reduced team productivity.
You might be thinking that all of this is very interesting from a personal perspective, but what has it got to do with the world of work and organisations.
Well the giveaway was the centrality of trust, with what it means in terms of performance within teams.
This is why an understanding of what the team and corporate values we espouse actually mean, is so vital.
If this is not properly articulated, explored and agreed; then it can be easy for the words (the values) and the pictures (the behaviours) not to match. And our brains are as capable of identifying and honing in on such inconsistency as they are of picking up the inflexible and absolute nature of statements we hear.
In an organisational setting, values may not be such rigid, absolute, binary statements but rather principles that we attempt to hold ourselves too; accepting, as is normal, that we may make mistakes but having the self awareness to understand when this has happened and holding ourselves and each accountable to these standards, with all that this means for management of internal drivers of behaviour, survival responses and unsurprisingly managing ego.
So it's a really simple, easy and straightforward task then.
Actually it's not it's a difficult and challenging skill that we need to deploy on an ongoing basis, and one key step to building and deploying this skill is checking in our absolute thoughts, and our ego, at the door.